Christians and morals
Mar. 6th, 2009 10:08 amWow, so Christians get really huffy when they start realizing that the crucifixion was a human sacrifice. Like really pissed off.
I guess they never really correlate the two until you show it to them.
I guess they never really correlate the two until you show it to them.
Canalbalism
Date: 2009-03-06 03:38 pm (UTC)(I've heard debates about that as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 04:13 pm (UTC)I've read some historians who feel part of Judaism's uniqueness was not monotheism, which it really is not, but its early renunciation of human sacrifice, which is why the instances of it in the Bible (Abraham and Issac; the warrior who promises the first thing he sees and it turns out to be his daughter; the crucifixion) are so striking.
Though, frankly, if I have to eat the flesh of any god, I prefer the noodly appendages of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, hallowed be his name ...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 05:13 pm (UTC)The key elements:
1) Sacrifice to the diety was important. Human sacrifice was the best and most necessary.
2) As societies advanced, the need for voluntary sacrifice rose. Eventually, bribery had to be used. The human sacrifice was often offered a year of being the king before their death, mirroring Jesus' ministry and him being the King of the Jews.
3) Consumption of the sacrificial flesh gave the divine blessing to all who partook, mirroring the communion.
There's more, but that's the main meat of it.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 07:18 pm (UTC)