Bad Emissions
Mar. 9th, 2006 12:04 pmok, so I went to go get my emissions test today.. I have always thought this was fucking stupid but whatever
I failed it.. you wanna know why? you wanna fucking know why? because my check engine light is burned out.
no, I'm not kidding, I am destroying the enviroment because I have a bunred out bulb on my dashboard.. they wouldn't even giv eme the rest of the emissions test...
Fuck you anyone who thinks that this emissions testing thing is a 'good idea' and not a 'currupt way to create jobs that aren't needed' and 'just another way to steal my money'
fuck all of you.
fucking liberal bastards...
I failed it.. you wanna know why? you wanna fucking know why? because my check engine light is burned out.
no, I'm not kidding, I am destroying the enviroment because I have a bunred out bulb on my dashboard.. they wouldn't even giv eme the rest of the emissions test...
Fuck you anyone who thinks that this emissions testing thing is a 'good idea' and not a 'currupt way to create jobs that aren't needed' and 'just another way to steal my money'
fuck all of you.
fucking liberal bastards...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:18 pm (UTC)That's bullshit.
But, *I* (being the liberal bastard that I am) do think that cars should be tested.
I just don't think you should have to pay for it.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:36 pm (UTC)I see these trucks and older cars just belch out toxic fumes. If I'm on the sidewalk, I can't breathe.
Of course cars olders than, what is it, twenty years are exempt from being tested (at least in Georgia it was)
But with all the automotive advancements that have been made, don't you think that it's the *older* cars that need to be tested?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 06:34 pm (UTC)And not doing the test is not failing. You only fail the test if theres something wroing with your actual emissions or your gas cap.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 06:47 pm (UTC)Refined diesel has very few pollutants or fumes. It's good stuff, and is used in Europe to some success in reducing emissions.
(the reason older cars aren't tested is to avoid a financial burden to the owner to get them up to standards..... stupid, ain't it?)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 07:14 pm (UTC)but stronger restrictions on those? NO!! there is more MONEY in charging the consumer... the emissions test are there to make money NOT to control air polution... it's hiding behind 'oh this is to help with the enviroment' which is bullshit.
and as far as paying for it? someone has to pay for it.. if it's paid for by the governemnt not only am I still paying for it but you are forcing people who don't have a car to pay for it as well.. that's not right at all!!
the entire 'emissions inspection' is bullshit.. plain and simple...
have you ever noticed that all the stats which are FOR emissions inspections only talk about the number of cars.. NOT the quaility of air... you know why? because it HASN'T HELPED.. AT ALL!! the quality of air has not changed since the inspections started.... go look for your self, try to find a study of air quality before and after the emissions inspections...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 07:16 pm (UTC)you can't pass a law that restricts something built before the law was past... same reason you can't deny the 8 americans legally allowed to smoke pot the right to smoke pot...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 07:49 pm (UTC)In NY, they do a huge inspection (brakes, wipers, headlights, taillights, etc). In Georgia, you could say that it is the annual inspection...the only thing inspected is the emmissions level.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 09:23 pm (UTC)See, I live in North Carolina, and you have to have an annual inspection, but this is the first i've heard about "emissions tests", and in order to have a license you HAVE to have insurance as well (which I have heard maybe only 2 other states do that)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 09:45 pm (UTC)Liberals are generally more interested in busting pollution created by corporations rather than hurting the poor folks who can't afford a nice, new car. But, of course, corporations don't want to stop polluting, so it will never happen unless the nation gets a whole lot less conservative.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 12:58 am (UTC)But you're right. As soon as I posted this I thought of the tax payer.
The government goes about things the long and hard way as it's wont to do and puts the burden on the working man.
But hell, you can't argue against the fact that air quality has gone down a lot.
Maybe it's not just combustuble engines maybe it's not just second hand smoking.
But when the newsbroadcast has an alert about the air for people who just want to freaking jog outside, somethings fucking wrong!
Dana Reeve died of lung cancer "cause unknown" screw that! I know what the freakin' cause was: the bloody fucking Los Angeles smog is probably the culprit!
*sigh* sorry for ranting.
Call me a tree-hugging-liberal-hippie but we need to ween ourselves off of oil.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 01:19 am (UTC)I have failed over a gas cap, myself.
And, what makes you think reducing air pollution is a fucking liberal bastards-only trait? If you dislike something does that make it liberal???? I am liberal. Do you dislike me?
Good conservatives care about conserving the environment, unless they are fucking religious right bastards who think that we can trash the earth because God's kingdom is in heaven.
WE!
Date: 2006-03-10 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 01:26 pm (UTC)it doesn't help with the weening off oil.. it doesn't help with anything to do with that...
it is a JOB PROGRAM. it's built to fool people into thinking it's there to help the enviroment. it's NOT.
Re: WE!
Date: 2006-03-10 01:28 pm (UTC)dance, dance, dance!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 01:29 pm (UTC)it's a JOB program!!! and yes, job programs are a liberal thing.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 01:30 pm (UTC)liberals are notorious for hiding one program behind the front of another... what do you think the corporation known as 'green peace' is?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 03:24 pm (UTC)I'll agree that having mandatory emission testing obviously ain't helping.
In my over 20 years of living in Atlanta, I can tell the difference from 5th grade years to before I left.
You're right, you're right: emissions inspection ain't doin' squat.
So begin second rant:
So perhaps maybe they should concentrate the people in the JOB PROGRAM into helping to refine the alternative sources of fuel that have been in development since the 70's, but subdued, since "god forbid" the shareholders of the Big Oil companies might lose some money to a compeditive source.
I think that's what I ment by the comment of "weening ourselves off of oil", because these products are by no means infinate and I'm getting sick and tired of the fights to keep things clean, our parks preserved and our young out of war.
Oh and even though I know you'll hate him you should give a listen to Jello Biafra's spoken word, he's got this one bit called "Die for oil sucker!" and the scariest thing about it is that it echos from the Gulf War what has been happening these past few years...Like father like son.
>end rant<
Love you man, happy birthday! Enjoy the watch!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 04:12 pm (UTC)Cleaning up pollution on the side of the highway? Sure, that's a job program. Constructing parks? I'd call that a job program, too.
But emissions inspections? That's just not job program material, if you ask me.
"liberals are notorious for hiding one program behind the front of another"
Hm, sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.
Admittedly, I know very little about Green Peace, but relatively few liberals are in any way involved with, just as few conservatives are involved with the Christian Coalition.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-11 08:17 pm (UTC)Give me a break John
Date: 2006-03-12 02:25 pm (UTC)Bull fucking shit!
I swear you don't define liberal as some one concerned with liberty and liberal policies you define liberal as "people I disagree with"
I'm liberal and the last damn thing I would do is hide a program behind another